I spent several weeks before UFC 199 seeing all sort of fans vent their indignation about Woodley getting an "undeserved" title shot. Never mind that Condit got his after an injury layoff and a win over the ghost of Thiago Alves.
However, it's apparently kosher for Hendo, who hasn't beaten an elite MW since he fought Bisping at UFC 100 seven years ago, to get a title fight in the hopes that he can win the belt and plunge the MW division into total chaos by immediately...
How is Bisping vs. Hendo more acceptable than Lawler vs. Woodley?
However, it's apparently kosher for Hendo, who hasn't beaten an elite MW since he fought Bisping at UFC 100 seven years ago, to get a title fight in the hopes that he can win the belt and plunge the MW division into total chaos by immediately...
How is Bisping vs. Hendo more acceptable than Lawler vs. Woodley?